Monthly Archives: 九月 2008

毒奶

China_Milk
別国一天一杯奶振兴一个民族,中国人一天一杯奶震惊一个民族

Advertisements

转载:谁是大马经济的罪魁祸首?

(转载自:肚懒公会

首相阿都拉昨天痛斥安华威胁国家经济,也可能对国家安全造成威胁。大马股市今早开市跌了19点,跌破千点大关。阿都拉在这个期间谴责安华威胁国家经济,节奏上占了便宜,但实际上,阿都拉领导的国阵政府又在建设国家经济方面带来什么程度的效益与成就?

正巧《华尔街时报》亚洲版适时为大家解答了这个疑问,它发表了一篇评论,点评阿都拉政权过去五年来为国家经济的«贡献»,今早成为 Malaysia Insider 及许多网站与博客的头条新闻。

WALL STREET JOURNAL ASIA

Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim announced this week that he has enough parliamentary support to unseat the current government, led by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. If he does, Abdullah’s lacklustre economic management will be largely to blame.

The prime minister has not introduced any substantive reforms during his nearly five years in office, preferring to rely instead on opening up the government purse. Under the Ninth Malaysia Plan announced in 2005, he expanded public-sector spending to RM200 billion annually from RM160 billion. In his Midterm Plan Review this year, he increased this outlay to RM240 billion. The national debt now stands at RM285 billion, up from RM192 billion in 2004. The official fiscal deficit has risen to 4.8% of GDP this year, from 3.2% last year. Revenue is being spent faster than it is coming in.

It’s hard to argue that these outlays have served the broad public interest. Much of the funding has been channelled to elites in the majority Malay community, under the country’s pro-Malay affirmation action programme. That has created discontent with many Malay who don’t see the full benefits of the programme, and among the minority Chinese and Indians, who are excluded from it altogether.

Abdullah’s stewardship has had a real impact on the economy. Capital flight has risen sharply; Malaysian investment abroad now exceeds inward foreign investment. The Kuala Lumpur stock exchange has lost almost one-fifth of its value this year to date. Malaysia’s currency, the ringgit, saw its biggest one-month loss last month since the end of the dollar peg in 2005. Although GDP growth has averaged a robust 5% annual growth under Abdullah, that record is now under threat. Inflation reached a record 8.5% this summer. Job creation has reached record lows, as unemployment, particularly among young majority Malays, remains high. Ironically, only the opposition-led state governments are attracting new foreign investment — and without the federal government’s help, no less.

Abdullah’s 2004 attempts to promote growth and investment — such as through the promotion of the biotechnology and agricultural industries — have failed. He also fumbled discussions with the United States on a free trade agreement, which have now stalled. What Malaysia really needs is education reform and the liberalisation of its labour markets to improve its economic competitiveness.

The political opposition, in the form of Anwar and his Pakatan Rakyat coalition, have seized on these issues. They have promised to root out corruption and to implement a new economic policy to address the concerns of all ethnic communities in Malaysia. Their platform aims to move beyond populist spending to introduce structural reforms in government procurement programmes and in the management of government-linked companies.

When Abdullah assumed office in 2004, he inherited an economy in need of structural reform. Malaysians have had to pay for his poor stewardship through higher prices, stagnating wages and growing private sector debt. Soon, Abdullah may have to pay the political price for that record.

#44:下台吧!

昨晚半夜收到1则短讯,说道记者陈云清被捕的消息。

看了短讯后,辗转难眠,迟迟不能入睡。

今早起身一翻开报纸,方知原来总共有三人,即Raja Petra, 先后在内安法令下被逮捕。顿时觉得无明火狂燃!

反内安法

废除内安法令!!

废除内安法令!!

我本身非常反对内安法。

无论是基于同情或人道立场。

就如欧阳文风前辈所说的:“马来西亚的内安法令赋于当权者无上权力,容许掌权者不必提供原因证据,不经审讯,可以拘捕任何他们「以为」威胁国家安全与想逮捕与拘留的人。”

如果政府认定他们能够对国家的安全造成威胁,那么就请用正当的法律将他们起诉,别耍无赖,使用这种“恶法”。

其实怎么看这三人都不足以威胁国家安全,反而是足以威胁国阵,尤其身为国阵老大的巫统。

如果内安法论为国阵对付异议份子的武器,那么就代表内安法令已经是国阵的“血滴子”,凡敢与之反抗者,一律要他人头落地。

废除内安法

我国是一个法治的国家。

所谓的法治,就是一切从法。

我国也已有足够的法令对付任何状况了。

而且都已经二十一世纪了,哪里还有所谓的“凭着感觉走”的法令?

只要“认为”威胁国家安全,无须证据,无须审讯就可以无限期延长扣留,让他吃无限期的咖哩饭,这是那个年代的事物啊?

就连“创始者”的英国本身都没有此等条例,只有我们的领袖好像当做是宝来珍藏。

每天高喊“Merdeka”,思维却停留在殖民地年代,这是哪门子的独立?

下台吧

一开始很多人对916都只是抱着观望的态度,谁也没把它当真。

然而,人民不乱,反而政府阵脚大乱。

无端端不知从哪儿冒出来一个赛夫的屁股,之后又依然在峇东埔大玩种族主义。

兵败峇东埔后,又对阿末的言论采取拖泥带水之策,轻轻“冻结”阿末后,便用内安法“保护”记者和“关照”郭素沁和Raja Petra。

种种劣迹看在选民的眼里,渐渐的对国阵由爱转没感觉,由没感觉转恨,巴不得马上就变天。

如果国阵政府依然执迷不悔,依然不把选民放在眼里,那么即使没变天也必定尽失民心。

废除内安法吧,不然国阵(尤其是巫统)就下台吧!

MANSUHKAN ISA!

ISA (DAP)ISA (Raja)ISA (Reporter)

#43:一只小苍蝇

之前看了一篇《当今大马》的报导,全国民政副总秘书刘永强发表文告说道:“阿末只是一只迷失方向的小苍蝇,不要再理睬他,让我们专注于强化国内国会民主的改革,包括急需处理的课题如通货膨胀…”

这篇文告让笔者看了很纳闷。

一只小苍蝇

真的只是一只小苍蝇吗?

一开始时,还以为真的是只有阿末这只小苍蝇。

但随着事情的演变,一天一天的恶化,才发现整个事件不是只有阿末这只小苍蝇。

当阿末在众人,包括伯拉,千呼万唤始出来后,召开了记者招待会后,表示支持不道歉立场的,不是只有阿末这只小苍蝇罢了。

支持不道歉的,就包括了槟州巫统署理主席拿督斯里阿都拉昔、槟州巫统秘书拿督阿沙哈、峇央峇鲁区部主席拿督莫哈末再因、大山脚区部主席拿督慕沙及高渊区部主席拿督再那阿比丁等区部领袖。

不仅不道歉,他们也表明认同阿末的言论是被“有心人”或“有心媒体”歪曲了。

咦?这么看来,至少半个槟州区部的里头都是苍蝇咯?

以此类推,那槟州巫统区部岂不是一个大苍蝇窝?

而身为槟州联委会主席的伯拉就是传说中的“苍蝇王”?

小苍蝇的力量

Ahmad1如果阿末真的是一只小苍蝇,可是刘永强却“百百”也没想到:一只小苍蝇就足以把民政和星洲日报搞得灰头土脸。

他也“千千”没想到,一只小苍蝇的支持者都已胆敢将前首席部长的照片撕烂后踩在脚下。

他更“万万”没想到,要摆平一只小苍蝇,竟然需要出动全体马华、马青、民政、民青、反对党、非政府组织等,每天日以继夜铺天盖地般的发表文告、发表新闻会加以谴责,才能让巫统“意思意思”冻结其“党权”三年。(注:不是党籍喔,而且是三年,下届大选时又是一条好汉!点击这里了解详情)

而且是总共耗了接近两个星期,闹得举国上下鸡犬不宁后,才能搞定。这只小苍蝇,上不怕伯拉纳吉,下不怕友党人民,即使被惩处后,依然面不改色,大言不惭不认错。

那么到底惩处又有什么实际作用呢?

巫统霸权

其实阿末只是巫统中无数个极端份子中的其中一个而已。

一直以来,种族主义早已根植在巫统核心的观念里,已是巫统文化的一部分了。

能造就这样的政治霸权,可谓马华和民政的汗马功劳不可抹杀。

长期的莫不吭声,软弱屈服,凡事只会内部协商的精神,促使巫统更加目中无人,常发表一些罔顾他族的言论。

高举马来剑和“寄居论”就是一个典型的例子。

只是308和826政治海啸后,马华和民政才来针对“寄居论”敢怒敢言,为时已晚。

然而笔者认为:“迟到好过没到”

只是巫统里的极端种族分子,阿末不是第一个,但他也不会是最后一个。

令伯有话讲(05-09-08)

什么标题?
非洲‧肯雅下雪‧居民以为世界末日

新闻出处?
星洲日报

新闻大意?
难道是气候变迁惹的祸?位于赤道的东非国家肯雅,竟然下起雪来。从未见过雪的村民,还以为世界末日,有人高呼:“耶稣回来了”。

Kenya Snow

令伯讲什么?
高兴吗?

现在连非洲平原都可以下雪了,还有什么是不可能发生的?

讲也讲到累了,重复也重复到腻了,还是老话一句:“珍惜环境吧,不然后果是难以想像的!”

无题

今天看了杨善勇的“大题小做”,看到了以下的一小段字,觉得很有意思,所以便转载在这里和大家分享:

运动磨练体质
言行透现气质
苦难考验素质
富贵显露本质

小事一桩

最近有小事一桩,让我没什么时间写部落格。
都是借口啦!

迟点吧,迟点我会向大家宣布的。先让我收拾好心情吧 !

%d 博主赞过: